Search by property

Jump to: navigation, search

This page provides a simple browsing interface for finding entities described by a property and a named value. Other available search interfaces include the page property search, and the ask query builder.

Search by property

A list of all pages that have property "Has Text" with value "Develop policies that benefit birds.". Since there have been only a few results, also nearby values are displayed.

Showing below up to 26 results starting with #1.

View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)


    

List of results

  • NCWAP 2015 Research Priority 432  + (Determine why some priority species use this habitat on the coast, when the same species primarily is found in the Mountains using completely different habitats (e.g., Wayne's [[Black-throated Green Warbler]], [[Worm-eating Warbler]], Wood Frog).)
  • US NABCI Policy and Funding Priority Action 1  + (Develop and implement a native grassland policy equivalent to the current “no net loss” policy for wetlands that would preclude federal agencies from providing public subsidies for practices harmful to native grassland habitats.)
  • NCWAP 2015 Monitoring Priority 449  + (Develop and implement monitoring systems aDevelop and implement monitoring systems and protocols for population trends for all high-elevation species, including those associated with northern hardwood forest, with top priority toward rare species and secondary priority toward all species occurring in this relatively rare community of the North Carolina landscape.community of the North Carolina landscape.)
  • NCWAP 2015 Monitoring Priority 72  + (Develop and implement systematic, long-term population monitoring protocols for cave-dwelling salamanders.)
  • NCWAP 2015 Monitoring Priority 137  + (Develop and maintain an integrated monitoring network to collect information for assessment of ecosystem outcomes and management actions associated with the implementation of management actions (APNEP 2012).)
  • NCWAP 2015 Management Practices Priority 143  + (Develop and refine ecological flow requirements for each major river (APNEP 2012) that drains to estuarine waters.)
  • NCWAP 2015 Management Practices Priority 545  + (Develop and/or implement techniques for managing pure spruce stands to include habitat components of the entire spruce–fir/northern hardwood community (i.e., thinning).)
  • US NABCI Addressing Threats Priority Action 1  + (Develop awareness campaigns to empower local stakeholders to participate in invasive species prevention and management efforts at priority sites.)
  • US NABCI Research and Evaluation Priority B  + (Develop best management practices and conservation plans based on science that emphasize conservation in places and at spatial scales most relevant to birds.)
  • US NABCI Research and Evaluation Priority C  + (Develop best management practices and conservation plans based on science that emphasize conservation in places and at spatial scales most relevant to birds.)
  • NCWAP 2015 Monitoring Priority 39  + (Develop climate change monitoring protocols or methods to monitor baseflow where priority species occur outside projects related to regulated water use (Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [FERC] licensing).)
  • NCWAP 2015 Management Practices Priority 114  + (Develop logistically and economically effective control strategies for controlling outbreaks of the most damaging insect pests and diseases.)
  • NCWAP 2015 Surveys Priority 524  + (Develop long-term monitoring strategies to document population trends, from which conservation strategies can be specifically designed to target those species (e.g., Coyote).)
  • NCWAP 2015 Monitoring Priority 35  + (Develop long-term monitoring strategies to document population trends, from which conservation strategies can be specifically designed to target those species which are experiencing declines.)
  • NCWAP 2015 Monitoring Priority 572  + (Develop long-term monitoring strategies to document population trends, from which conservation strategies can be specifically designed to target those species.)
  • NCWAP 2015 Monitoring Priority 505  + (Develop long-term monitoring to identify population trends and to assess performance of conservation actions. Monitoring plans should be coordinated with other existing monitoring programs where feasible.)
  • NCWAP 2015 Research Priority 120  + (Develop long-term research studies to investigate various methods for restoring and maintaining Longleaf Pine ecosystems, including herbicides, fire, clearcutting, site preparation techniques, and management practices.)
  • NCWAP 2015 Monitoring Priority 217  + (Develop monitoring for any North Carolina Develop monitoring for any North Carolina floodplain forest bird species that require specialized attention, since neither BBS nor standard point counts can adequately sample irregularly distributed or clumped species like Kentucky, Cerulean, and Swainson's warblers.ntucky, Cerulean, and Swainson's warblers.)
  • NCWAP 2015 Monitoring Priority 121  + (Develop monitoring for any North Carolina Develop monitoring for any North Carolina dry Longleaf Pine bird species that require specialized attention, since neither BBS nor standard point counts adequately sample for many species like [[Bachman's Sparrow]], Nightjars, [[American Kestrel]], [[Henslow's Sparrow]], and [[Red-headed Woodpecker]].[[Red-headed Woodpecker]].)
  • US NABCI Research and Evaluation Priority Action 1  + (Develop multi-agency integrated approach to research and monitoring in order to provide information on broad patterns and trends.)
  • NCWAP 2015 Monitoring Priority 311  + (Develop or enhance long-term monitoring for amphibians and reptiles (Taylor and Jones 2002). There is also a decided lack of long-term monitoring information on most bat species (Ellis et al. 2002).)
  • NCWAP 2015 Monitoring Priority 219  + (Develop or enhance long-term monitoring for most bat species (Ellis et al. 2002).)
  • NCWAP 2015 Monitoring Priority 480  + (Develop or enhance long-term monitoring for breeding and wintering birds, amphibians and reptiles, and mammal populations (including bats) that use this habitat (Ellis et al. 2002; Taylor and Jones 2002).)
  • NCWAP 2015 Monitoring Priority 218  + (Develop or enhance long-term monitoring for amphibians and reptiles (Taylor and Jones 2002).)
  • NCWAP 2015 Conservation Programs And Partnerships Priority 76  + (Develop plans to protect caves where roosting bats or other cave resources are at risk from human intrusion.)
  • NCWAP 2015 Monitoring Priority 70  + (Develop protocols and procedures for long-term bat banding study and data storage throughout the state.)
  • NCWAP 2015 Monitoring Priority 139  + (Develop sensors for biological and chemical sensing to determine status and trends, as well as tagging and tracking of wildlife (NIEPS 2010).)
  • NCWAP 2015 Monitoring Priority 462  + (Develop standardized monitoring programs analogous to the [[Breeding Bird Survey]] for reptiles, amphibians and small mammals. Of particular interest is trend information for those species dependent upon snags and woody debris.)
  • NCWAP 2015 Management Practices Priority 127  + (Develop strategies for pine straw raking that minimizes impacts to understory habitat structure.)
  • NCWAP 2015 Management Practices Priority 577  + (Develop transportation facilities that utiDevelop transportation facilities that utilize longer bridges at streams and wetlands to minimize impacts (and thereby reduce mitigation requirements) and provide crossing options for wildlife that often travel riparian corridors. Wildlife underpasses should be constructed for all new highway projects, as these reduce wildlife–vehicle collisions, conserve important travel corridors, and provide linkages for bear populations and many other wildlife species.pulations and many other wildlife species.)
  • NCWAP 2015 Conservation Programs And Partnerships Priority 472  + (Direct county and state-level land use plaDirect county and state-level land use planning to minimize development within large, unfragmented tracts of forests. This would be most appropriate and effective in the regions that are, as yet, not heavily developed, including Montgomery, Stanly, Randolph and Richmond counties in the southern [[Piedmont]], and the northern tier counties of Surry, Stokes, Rockingham, Caswell, Person, and Granville.ockingham, Caswell, Person, and Granville.)
  • NCWAP 2015 Surveys Priority 95  + (Direct initial efforts toward surveys to determine current baseline distribution and status of species associated with cove hardwood forest for which that information is lacking.)
  • NCWAP 2015 Surveys Priority 382  + (Direct initial efforts toward surveys to determine the current baseline distribution and status of species mainly associated with mesic forests (especially those that are state-listed or believed to be declining) for which that information is lacking.)
  • NCWAP 2015 Conservation Programs And Partnerships Priority 484  + (Discern and offer increased protection to specialized pocosin types. Though extensive amounts of pocosin lands are already protected, some require more protection, such as Carolina bays (Bladen Lakes area) and white cedar stands.)
  • NCWAP 2015 Surveys Priority 89  + (Distributional and status surveys are needed for aquatic snails, crayfish, mussels, and fish (in order of general need).)
  • NCWAP 2015 Surveys Priority 176  + (Document [[Bald Eagle]] nesting sites.)
  • NCWAP 2015 Research Priority 604  + (Document how priority species are utilizing the habitat and whether specific hydrological and biological requirements are being met under current management regimes.)
  • NCWAP 2015 Research Priority 347  + (Document the habitat selection and competition factors related to [[Indigo Bunting]]s and [[Painted Bunting]]s in these habitats (Kopachena and Crist 2000).)
  • NCWAP 2015 Surveys Priority 425  + (Document the status and distribution of priority bat species (e.g. Rafinesque's Big-eared Bat, Northern Yellow Bat, Seminole Bat, Southeastern Bat, and Northern Long-eared Bat) in this habitat.)
  • NCWAP 2015 Management Practices Priority 598  + (Employ hydrological restoration methods such as plugging ditches where ditches are affecting the hydrology of the pools.)
  • US NABCI Engagement and Partnership Priority A  + (Empower community- and incentive-based conservation through partnerships.)
  • NCWAP 2015 Monitoring Priority 385  + (Enhance current monitoring systems and protocols (e.g., MAPS and BBS) to better cover certain species not well covered by current monitoring efforts.)
  • NCWAP 2015 Monitoring Priority 112  + (Enhance current monitoring systems and protocols (e.g., MAPS and BBS) to better cover species not well covered by current monitoring efforts.)
  • NCWAP 2015 Management Practices Priority 190  + (Ensure floodplain buffers of 300 to 600 feet in as many areas as possible. Where possible, forest patches should be connected along river systems to provide connectivity.)
  • NCWAP 2015 Management Practices Priority 224  + (Ensure floodplain buffers of 300 to 600 feEnsure floodplain buffers of 300 to 600 feet in as many areas as possible. This would benefit floodplain forest species such as the [[Northern Parula]], [[Swallow-tailed Kite]], [[Mississippi Kite]], [[Prothonotary Warbler]], [[Wood Thrush]], Swainson's and Cerulean warblers, and [[Acadian Flycatcher]], as well as amphibians, Timber Rattlesnakes, and forest bats.ans, Timber Rattlesnakes, and forest bats.)
  • NCWAP 2015 Conservation Programs And Partnerships Priority 304  + (Ensure that all existing high-elevation rock outcrops are high priorities for conservation action, as they are extremely rare, have a very restricted range, and are subject to extreme environmental conditions.)
  • NCWAP 2015 Monitoring Priority 41  + (Ensure that bridge and culvert designs allow for stream movement and aquatic organism passage. Design standards may need alteration to accommodate environmental changes and increased floodwaters (Transportation Research Board 2008).)
  • NCWAP 2015 Conservation Programs And Partnerships Priority 394  + (Ensure that conservation actions include lEnsure that conservation actions include land acquisition, easements, and protection to promote remaining large, unfragmented tracts as well as management to maintain and reestablish mesic forest. This is a relatively rare forest type and great effort should be made to protect mesic forests and their species assemblages. Conservation of larger natural areas that include adjacent communities will lead to greater viability for all communities present.ter viability for all communities present.)
  • NCWAP 2015 Management Practices Priority 43  + (Ensure that management of riverine habitats promotes the natural evolution and movement of woody and rocky structures and natural processes like bank dynamics, channel meanders, and flood regimes.)
  • NCWAP 2015 Research Priority 206  + (Ensure that research studies targeting birEnsure that research studies targeting birds are long-term, large-scale, replicated studies that have controlled experimental approaches and focus on population demographics and the response of species to habitat manipulations where appropriate (as outlined by the National Partners in Flight Research working group) (Donovan et al. 2002; NCWRC 2005). Similar research priorities are needed for other floodplain forest taxa including bats, small mammals, amphibians, and reptiles., small mammals, amphibians, and reptiles.)